Were they Christians, Jews, or Israel?

🔑 The Answer: All three in different ways

Let’s break it down:


🧔‍♂️ 1. They Accepted the Label “Christian” — Under Pressure and Persecution

Both Polycarp and Ignatius clearly accepted and even embraced the term Christian — but in a very specific context:

Ignatius (Magnesians 4:1):
“It is fitting not only to be called Christians, but to be so in reality.”

Polycarp (Martyrdom 10:1):
“I am a Christian. If you desire to learn the doctrine of Christianity, assign me a day and listen.”

  • The word Christian (Greek: Χριστιανός) was likely first used by pagans in Antioch (Acts 11:26) — possibly as mockery or scorn, like saying “Messiah-follower.”

  • For Polycarp and Ignatius, claiming that title during interrogation was an act of defiant faith.

  • It meant: Yes, I follow the crucified and risen Messiah of Israel.

They did not invent this term — they accepted it under fire, like a brand burned into their identity by the world.


✡️ 2. They Still Identified as the True Israel

Neither Ignatius nor Polycarp ever says, “We’ve started a new religion.”
Instead, they speak as those who inherit the covenant, the Scriptures, and the promises — not reject or replace them.

Ignatius says:

“If we are still living according to Judaism, we confess that we have not received grace.” (Magnesians 8:1)

But he also affirms:

“The prophets, being inspired by his grace, lived according to Christ Jesus.” (Magnesians 8:2)

Key Insight:

  • Ignatius does not reject Israel — he redefines it.

  • For him, those who follow Messiah are the faithful remnant of Israel.

  • He criticizes Judaism apart from Christ, but sees the church as the true Israel, not a gentile sect.


🕊️ 3. Their Bible Was the Hebrew Scriptures

  • Polycarp’s Epistle to the Philippians quotes frequently from:

    • Psalms

    • Proverbs

    • Isaiah

    • Genesis

  • These were still their Scriptures — the Tanakh was their Bible.

  • They read it through the lens of Messiah Yeshua, not as a discarded Old Testament.

They did not see themselves as “ex-Christians” or “post-Jews.”
They saw themselves as the righteous remnant of Israel, those who had recognized the Messiah.


4. Christian Was a Badge, Not a New Religion

To them:

  • “Christian” = follower of the Messiah

  • “Israel” = God’s covenant people, now centered around the Messiah

  • “Jew” = Either ethnic identity or covenant status (they did not reject it, but spiritualized it)

This lines up with what Paul taught decades earlier:

“They are not all Israel who are descended from Israel… the children of promise are regarded as descendants.” (Romans 9:6–8)


📜 Summary Table

Identity TermWho Gave ItHow Polycarp/Ignatius Treated It
ChristianOutsiders/pagansEmbraced under persecution as true Messiah-followers
IsraelScriptural identityClaimed as fulfillment of God's promises through Christ
JewishEthnic/covenant labelAccepted the Scriptures, rejected Torah-without-Christ

🧠 Final Thought

Polycarp and Ignatius never imagined themselves as starting a new “Christian religion.”
They understood themselves as:

  • Followers of the Jewish Messiah

  • The faithful Israel of God

  • Recipients of God’s promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob

  • Willing to wear the world’s label “Christian” as a witness unto death

They bore the name “Christian” before the Roman governor —
But they lived as sons of Israel before the God of Abraham.




Sign Up To Comment